Let me start by stating the obvious: the Arctic
Region consists of land, water and air, and international law applies to
this region as it does to any region in the world. States have sovereignty
over their land and sea territory, as well as over their air space and
coastal states have certain well defined sovereign rights in their exclusive
economic zones and over their continental shelves as well as certain functional
jurisdiction. There is no legal vacuum that is particular to the Arctic
region.
Why then is it worth discussing the subject International Law and Scientific
Research in the Arctic?
Basic assumptions:
1. The main part of the Arctic consists of international water (geographic
aspect)
2. The population is a mixture of indigenous peoples and non-indigenous
people (human rights, self-determination).
3. Mankind as a whole has a legal interest in the situation in the Arctic.
4. Parts of the region are inaccessible parts of the year due to harsh
weather conditions.
5. Security aspects have always been prevalent in the region. They still
are.
6. Economic interests are at stake.
7. Pollution in the Arctic is different from pollution of the Arctic.
Issues to be addressed:
1. Freedom of the high seas comprises freedom of scientific research.
2. Marine scientific research is one type of research.
3. The means and methods of conducting scientific research have changed
since the adoption of UNCLOS.
4. There is a legal distinction to made between activities such as research,
exploration, surveying.
5. Scientific research plays an increasingly important role in the implementation
of legal principles such as the precautionary principle.
6. The Arctic region is subject both to regional and global regimes.
7. Challenges: Science as a tool for cooperation and confidence-building
in the Arctic – legal aspects.