Federal Foreign Office of Germany Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Norway Max Planck Institute Adelphi Research

Mr. Rolf Fife
Director General, Department of Legal Affairs, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Oslo (Norway)

 

The Arctic is among the areas hardest affected by global climate changes. However, their causes do not lie in the Arctic. The analysis of trends, based on data collected through early cooperation within the framework of the Arctic Council, clearly speaks in favour of effective action at global levels. This underscores the importance of the Copenhagen Climate Conference in December.

 

Sea ice is receding and changing its character in the Arctic Ocean. This gives rise to possibilities and challenges. Nevertheless, this ocean is far from lawless. An extensive international legal framework already applies to it - with or without ice. We thus have a large tool-box. The challenge is to take timely measures - something which in turn requires effectively implementing the ground rules and formulating appropriate policies. We need to identify and address the real issues, not engage in abstract discussions on alternative legal frameworks. The Arctic Council may provide for essential input to policy formulation in several fields.

The Law of the Sea Convention provides the comprehensive legal framework with the ground rules, including for ice-covered waters. The coastal states have particular rights, obligations and responsibilities in their zones and on their continental shelves, while other States have freedoms and rights in conformity with the Convention. Effective policies and accountability depend on clarity of jurisdiction.

 

Particular responsibilities, as well as a need to promote broad international cooperation in several fields, were recognised by the five coastal states of the Arctic Ocean in the Ilulissat Declaration of 28 May 2008. This declaration by the Foreign Ministers also indicates concrete issues that need to be addressed in order to secure the responsible and sustainable management of the Arctic Ocean:

 

  • Delineation of the outer limits of the continental shelf. There is no “lawless race for the resources in the Arctic Ocean”. The Convention leaves no uncertainty. It sets out the rules for the establishment of the outer limits of the continental shelf. Clarity of jurisdiction requires following these rules. This may also require cooperation between coastal States, including with regard to drawing of boundaries between their continental shelves and zones. Such cooperation is under way in the Arctic Ocean.

 

  • Protection of the marine environment. The melting of the ice can lead to increased human activity, such as shipping and exploitation of natural resources. A sustainable balance between human activities and the protection of the fragile Arctic environment needs to be achieved. Essential in this regard are comprehensive management plans as well as environmental impact assessments. Attention is drawn to current work in the Arctic Council, the IMO and OSPAR, as well as the 1991 Espoo Convention.

 

  • Navigation. No one can afford a new Exxon Valdez accident. Increased navigation must be met by the development of appropriate international regulations within the IMO. The Polar Code should be strengthened and made binding. Consideration of vessel trafficking systems, navigation routes and sea traffic separation schemes should take place in a timely manner. Search and Rescue operations are particularly challenging in the Arctic Ocean, as highlighted by Arctic Council work on this issue.

 

  • Exploitation of the natural resources on the continental shelf. Given the extreme fragility of the environment in the Arctic Ocean, possible utilization of oil and gas resources must be carried out under the strictest environmental standards and with the best technology available. The Arctic Council would play an important part in developing further necessary knowledge base and standards.
  • Exploitation of the living marine resources in the Central Arctic Ocean. Commercial fisheries may in the future expand into the Arctic Ocean. Under the UN Fish Stocks Agreement implementing the Convention, particular responsibilities must be discharged for the conservation and management of any straddling and highly migratory species in the high seas area of the Arctic Ocean.